IoT operator Sigfox is confident that competing LPWAN technologies are no match to its own offering at this point. An exclusive interview with Thomas Nicholls, executive vice president of communication at Sigfox.
We can count the days without an announcement on Low-Power Wide-Area Network (LPWAN), a market that is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 93.01 percent between 2016 and 2022, according to Infoholic Research. The race is on between the likes of Sigfox, LoRaWan and NB-IoT. Toulouse-based IoT operator Sigfox believes however that it has a unique position in the LPWAN market. Furthermore, comparing Sigfox with LoRa or NB-IoT is a bit like comparing apples and oranges: there are multiple solutions and there is ample room for various actors and solutions. ”The most important thing for people to understand is that the IoT base is huge and that there will be multiple types of connectivity. Also, it is crucial to understand the positioning of the different solutions and here nobody has a similar positioning as Sigfox,” Thomas Nicholls, executive vice president of communication at Sigfox, told Industrial IoT 5G Insights. ”There will not be one actor winning everything because the different accesses cater for different types of applications. And there are many use cases that can only be addressed by other solutions than Sigfox.”
”No one can match Sigfox offering”
So, competing solutions will co-exist but not one matches what Sigfox can offer, according to Nicholls. He views NB-IoT as a complementary solution to Sigfox, saying that the cost of integrating NB-IoT in an end-point is ten times as high as with Sigfox. It has in addition yet to be standardized and hit the market. ”It costs 40 dollars per end-point today since you have to use traditional LTE modules. Prices will drop over time, maybe over the next five to ten years. But it will still be significantly more expensive than Sigfox,” said Thomas Nicholls.
As for LoRaWan and Ingenu, he believes these solutions can only succeed in the private network space. ”We are yet to see one country covered with LoRaWan or Ingenu and we do not really believe this will happen. The models are flawed for public networks but fine for private networks,” said Nicholls. ”Saying that Samsung is rolling out a LoRa network with SK Telecom is an exaggeration. Samsung is a gigantic organization with one division that sells network equipment. They of course sell to anyone that wants to buy their equipment, including SK Telecom,” he added.
The Sigfox executive suggests that a fair comparison to Sigfox should look at four different elements: service type, coverage, energy consumption and subsection and end-point connection costs. ”Using that type of comparative approach, you will find there is no one that can match the Sigfox offering … Some vendors are confusing the market by saying they have competing offers, when in reality they either have a very different offer or are in such an early stage that they do not yet have a commercially available offer.”
Ongoing Expansion
Truth be told, Sigfox can boast a 1.3 million square kilometer coverage across 20 countries. But to stay ahead of competition, it must keep moving fast. The company announced recently a nationwide rollout in Finland, which should be completed by spring 2017. Sigfox is also expanding its IoT network to 100 U.S. cities. ”We do not see any actor in the market that can compete with us. And lots of big customers are waiting for us to have deployed nationwide or Europe-wide. It is still a blue ocean market for us,” said Nicholls.
Yet, the company has been reported to have faced a customer backlash. Light Reading reports that bicycle tracking gadget company Nigiloc has joined in the criticism earlier expressed by Sigfox rivals and was one of a number of Sigfox customers to have terminated their planned Sigfox rollout due to ”bad coverage and failing technology”. In an unrelated comment, Thomas Nicholls told Industrial IoT 5G Insights that ”there are additionally some actors in the market with an interest to slow down the market. It is a common strategy for large organizations to slow down disruption in order to figure out how to best react,” adding that Sigfox job was to stay focused on execution and not getting distracted.
Sigfox chooses new countries to cover based on a number of parameters, but also addresses incoming opportunities from potential Sigfox Network Operators as they arise. The end goal is to build out a complete worldwide network, Nicholls explained.
Acquisitions could also come into play as part of the company’s growth strategy . ”But we are not in the process of acquiring anyone right now,” added Nicholls.
Sigfox’s low ARPU business model
Traditional operators have massive overheads and competing in the low ARPU segment might prove more difficult for them. Sigfox believes it can take advantage of this. ”Sigfox focuses on the use cases that only support a very low ARPU. These use cases are not addressed by current or future versions of the cellular networks or by the ways in which those networks are deployed and managed. It is a very complementary offer. If you look at evolutions such as NB-IoT, then you’ll quickly notice that there is still a gap in pricing, especially on the end points, and in energy consumption. There will also be many use cases that combine Sigfox and cellular,” said Nicholls.
The operator’s business model is simple: provide a global connectivity solution and that is it. Data subscriptions are provided to the distributors, which the company calls Sigfox Network Operators, and they in turn sell connectivity to various channels, including consultants, vertical experts, MNOs. ”It is a pyramidal mode that relies on efficient partnerships,” said Nicholls.
Eying an IPO
Sigfox had revenues of $12 million in 2015, triple 2014 revenues. That number is expected to grow significantly this year as well. The company will be also doubling the number of employees in 2016. Being in an expansion phase, the IoT operator is not yet profitable. It is planning another important round of financing in the near future. ”The round will most likely drive us to the IPO we are planning in the coming years,” said Nicholls. Sigfox’s business model is all about volume and, according to Nicholls, the company can reach profitability despite the ”ridiculously small amounts of money by subscription” it makes. ”It takes only a couple of large deals per country for that country to be profitable. Other actors trying to enter the operated low power connectivity space have instead high expenses and more complicated organization; it is more difficult for them to live in a very low ARPU world,” he said.
Source:Industrial IoT 5G
Source:Industrial IoT 5G
No comments:
Post a Comment